Most PPC enthusiasts will be aware of the four common AdWords matching types:
- Broad
- Phrase
- Exact
- Negative (can be broad, phrase or exact)
Here is a quick overview of what keyword matching is all about, for the non PPC folks:
Keyword matching allows you to control how precise a user’s search must be to trigger your ad on Google search pages. Defining how broadly or narrowly your keywords are targeted helps you reach the audience you want. Source AdWords Learning Center
However based on AdWords definition of match types, I think I have found a new one and I am naming it the 'bogus broad match'.
So what is the bogus broad match type?
Good question, it seems to be a hybrid of the broad match type and the ability to bid on partially related keywords. How and when it evolved I am uncertain, although I am pretty sure of its existence.
Let's look at the characteristics of a broad match first:
- Other words are included in the query
- Terms in the query are not written in the same sequence as your keyword
- The query is similar to your keyword. This includes plurals and synonyms.
- All the terms must be present
The bogus broad match takes all the above characteristics except for the last one "“ not all the terms have to be present.
By this I have had an experience of bidding on a two worded keyphrase and the ad showing for only a one worded search term.
An example of this would be to bid on the keyword phrase 'bank holiday' on broad match and for your ad to be shown for the search term 'holiday'. This would result in unqualified paid traffic landing on your site, eeek!
You may wander how I discovered what the actual search term was "“ this was not through a third-party analytics package, it was though AdWords very own Search Query Report.
This is difficult to prove without providing login details, and I am curious to see if anyone else has experienced a sighting of the bogus broad match type.
How to overcome the bogus broad match type?
If you believe in that the bb match type existing there is a way to overcome it and it involves the lesser known negative embedded match type. This did the trick for me, but seems a little unnecessary:
e.g.
Bank holiday
"“[holiday]
You may have to include embedded negative plurals and synonyms "“ although I have not had a problem with this.
It is always good practice to run search query report every now and then as part of campaign optimisation and if you do, you may encounter the bogus broad match – be warned! Of course, it could be a blip in the search query reporting or perhaps even a blip in my reporting – although I would like to say the latter is unlikely to be true as I have experienced it several times in the last couple of months. Anyone else seen the same?


It's been quite a debate for a while now – should you consider keywords as separate entities with regards to quality score?
Ok you now have lots of tasty ingredients to make that killer landing page and you’re finally ready to go!
Once you have an idea of the type of
Targeted landing pages can be a great way in converting visitors into a pre-defined action. Persuasive on-page copywriting and page layout is a key part in landing page optimisation (LPO), although this alone is where many search marketers often run out of steam.