Choosing the Right Domain Name: To Brand or not to Brand?

December 20th, 2009 by admin

Picture this, you are about to start a new online business adventure, your business plan is complete and the funding agreed. You’ve spotted a gap in the market and you are ready to go.

But wait, are you sure you have the right business and domain name? After all, first impressions count and you want to be remembered, don’t you? I thought so and remembered in the right context too.  Hang on, what about search engine marketing I hear you gasp?

Good question, your domain name is the entrance to your website and can be a key part in you search engine marketing arsenal. It also sets the mood for what your business is a about.

Choosing a domain name for SEO and PPC?

Seobook lists three important factors to consider when buying a domain for SEO.

  • Brand
  • Rankability
  • Linkability

Today we will concentrate on the first two. In fact, there has been a long debate as to whether you should go for a brandable or a keyword rich domain (like ours) and Problogger weighs in with some interesting pros and cons.  Here are our thoughts:

Brand Domains

Brandable domains are generally easier to remember and can be great for creating a buzz and promoting your site virally. They are popular with large brands, think Google or Aviva.  Global sites often opt for a branded domain, although it can also work for smaller sites too. When using a brandable domain name – it often pays to have a strong strapline message which descriptive and also inspiring.

It is important to understand that brands take time to develop and are built upon reputation.

Keyword Rich Domains

Keyword rich domains incorporate important keywords in them and can be very powerful in terms of rankability and click-through-rates. This is because the theme of the site is clear.

Search engines reward early adopters of ‘exact match’ domain names with good rankings geared around exact keywords used in the domain – this is also true on a smaller scale for related phrases too.  Every time another sites links to you using your brand, the theme is being reinforced to Google and other search engines about what your site is. www.seotraining.org.uk is a good example of this.

Click-through-rates play a huge role in PPC and are similarly important for natural search results. A keyword rich domain takes a ‘what it says on the tin’ approach and this can really help pull people in for relevant terms and in boosting your click-through-rate.

Keyword rich domains often return faster rankings although they can limit future growth if you business’s core products or services change over time.

To brand or not to brand? It really depends on your business objectives and ‘the way you like to roll’. No magic bullet exists I am afraid. If you are still unsure, please leave a comment below.

SEO blogging tips in Welsh

December 1st, 2009 by admin

If you are from Wales or speak Welsh, you may like to read our Welsh translation of Aaron Wall’s great SEO Blogger’s guide. Here it is:

http://www.seotraining.org.uk/r-bloggers-arwain-seo
Wales SEO

If you can’t speak Welsh, it really is worth a read and you will find it in many languages over here:

http://www.seobook.com/bloggers

The true value of a Digg link

March 19th, 2008 by admin

With all the chatter of Google punishing PageRank for Digg stories, I thought it's worth looking at the true value of links acquired from Digg or any social news site that uses dofollow.

To do this, let's consider the three types of links that Digg can help you get:

1. Primary links – direct links from Digg readers to your site.
2. Secondary links – indirect links from Digg readers who link via Digg.
3. Dud Links – links that result in neither primary and/or secondary links.
These are links that are solely from Digg and receive a negligible amount of PageRank.

The aim is to scoop up as many primaries and also secondaries as you can, with primary ones being the most desirable.

Typically you have little control as to the proportion of primary or secondary links that you get. If there is a good bit of banter within the Digg comments, there is a fair chance you will get a bigger dosage of secondary links.

So how do you know if you are getting primary, secondary or dud links I hear you ask?

Well that's where Yahoo Site Explorer comes in handy:

To illustrate this, let's look at the recent Digg/PageRank debate over at Sphinn. We are using Sphinn (digg clone) as the ‘Digg’ example.
http://sphinn.com/story/35232 – Sphinn page.
http://startupearth.com/2008/03/07/google-to-punish-pagerank-for-digg-stories/ – Orginal post.

Now go over to Yahoo Site Explorer and enter the above urls, making sure you click on the Inlinks link and show Inlinks "Except this domain".

Primary links

primary links

Secondary links

secondary links

You will see that the primary links account for 13 links and the secondary links for for 8. There is one more step and that is to remove the secondary links from the above primary count. That sounds more confusing than it is, although it just means subtracting Sphinn links from from the primary ones.

Depending on how many primary links there are you may want to do this manually or export the TSV list provided by Yahoo. For this example, there are currently three Sphinn links, leaving 10 primary links as of writing. As I am linking to both, I suspect these numbers will change fairly soon.

Patrick Altoft gave me the idea of for this post in a post of his own and I agree and disagree with his last comment.

Remember that the aim of Digg isn't to get links from Digg, it's to get links from Digg readers websites.

I think Patrick’s wording is not quite right and using my analogy above I would say that the aim is to get both primary and secondary links via Digg.

I maybe wrong, but I suspect Google's algo already covers the whole Digg/PageRank spectacle. After all it’s only PageRank that we are talking about.

And this leads to the question, why would Google team up with an external party to sort out its own PageRank issues? It just doesn’t add up to me.

19 March 2008, the day Google’s homepage broke!

March 19th, 2008 by admin

Broken Googlw

Well maybe not entirely broken, but with only one image to get right you’d think they could manage that! Anyone else seeing this at the moment?

Here are the stats of the missing image:

Location: /www.google.com/intl/en_ALL/images/logo.gif
Width: 276px
Height: 110px
Size of File: 0 kB (0 bytes)
Alternate text: Google

Has Google put a slash at the start of the location path that shouldn’t be there?

Google Website Reconsider Request, it only takes 3 days!

March 14th, 2008 by admin

Well that's my recent experience of a big site that is well known worldwide. It may be just as speedy for smaller sights too and I've got to take my hat off to Google for being so quick off the mark. Maybe it's a coincidence, maybe reconsider requests were running low for March in Google, either way I think you need a genuine reason and here is how Google dealt with mine and a bit of a background overview:

  • Big authority site gets redirected (301) from established keyword rich domain to newly bought exact match brand domain (three weeks ago).
  • Organic traffic pretty consistent for a week whilst old site is still fairly well indexed. Organic traffic & rankings nose-dive at the start of the second week. Site can't rank in the top 50 in Google for its own brand with an exact match brand domain name and an established 301 redirected domain with the exact content that has heaps and heaps of backlinks pointing to it.
  • Wait two further weeks with no further developments. Then put in a Google reconsider request explaining that the new domain has only recently been purchased and that the previous domain history/owner is unknown and due to extremely poor rankings over previous couple of weeks it is suspected that the site might have a penalty associated to it or maybe a duplicate content filter as the new domain had been significantly indexed before the 301 redirect was put in place {not my fault :) }.
  • And as if by magic, 3 days later the site is ranking for its brand and many of the previous highly competitive keyphrases and pretty much back to where it was before the site migration.
  • I would have taken a month of organic downtime traffic at the start, but I was suspicious of the inability to rank for sites own brand name and after a courtesy of three weeks and reading Matt's reconsider request I thought it was time I should do something about it.

    As Matt Cutts points out, it is no longer called a reinclusion request:

    not every spam penalty results in removal from Google's index, so "reconsideration" is more accurate than "reinclusion”.

    Needless to say I was very pleased and could wipe the sweat of my brow one last time when someone asked me why the site no longer ranked for its own brand name.

    Coincidently, it appears that you can now get penalty notifications from Google Webmaster Central for future domain owners which may shine more light in these types of circumstances.

    The reconsider request is there to help out when sites really do need it most and I hope it is used with the consideration it deserves as I'd hate for it to be removed due to “every man and his dog” whacking in a silly nilly request. If such a request is used inappropriately, this is probably a pretty good way to piss Google off. So here's a big cry out to 'all men with dogs', this is not the golden ticket for eternal Google love and you may do more bad than good!

    {Sorry I have neglected the blog for so long, I will try to be much better in the future:) }

Miss SEO 2008

December 30th, 2007 by admin

soldier

We have a new Miss SEO 2008 – Kylie Johnston. Some you may not have heard of her in the wider SEO cummunity, but she is certainly up and coming in the Southern-Eastern Ohio region!

Here is what Kylie Johnston had to say for herself:

"I want to promote conservation, especially to youth in schools," she said. "I also want to promote the performing arts. They're such an important part of the community."

And here is a translation of what she probably meant to say :)

"I want to promote social media, especially to the linkarati on Digg. I also want to promote all performing PPC ads. They're such an important part of the our online community."

3 SEM tools you should have in your SEO arsenal!

December 10th, 2007 by admin

Here’s 3 free SEM tools that you may have not used, but should! They are relatively new to my collection:

  • Paessler Site Inspector – a downloadable programme that is great for web devlopers and SEOs in examining a web page.
  • HTTrack Website Copier – allowing you to download a website onto your local machine. Great for on-page optimsation on long train journeys with no internet access.
  • SPAM detector – this tool attempts to detect keyword stuffing, doorway farms and hidden text.

And here is a bonus tool that you probably have used, but if not – you should!
SEO Book Backlink Analyzer. Does what it says on the tin!

How do you view the source code?

November 7th, 2007 by admin

Viewing the source of a website is always a good starting point when doing an SEO health check. Let’s look at a few ways:

  1. Do you use 'ctr+u' in firefox and take the old fashioned approach of checking out the code?
  2. Do you put on your xray specs to see key elements?
  3. My current favourite is the 'inspect’ option using firebug.
  4. Another option is to use the web developer extension and there is little doubt that its the best all rounder. Use the 'Outline block level elements' and 'Show elements names when outlining' to view HTML elements.

Do you have a another handy way?

What’s new at Web Master Central?

November 3rd, 2007 by admin

Quite a lot as it happens:

  • You can now associate website content by the country per-domain, per-subdomain, or per-directory level "“ very useful indeed. It will be interesting to see how useful this really is.
  • View and block potential Google sitelinks. I have experience of this taking two weeks, very useful if you have out-of-date sitelinks
  • You may like to submit multiple sitemaps to Google's Web Master Central, now you can.

Firefox more popular than I.E. 6

November 3rd, 2007 by admin

Slightly misleading as Internet Explorer is still the most popular browser, but Firefox is more commonly used than Internet Explorer 6, just!

Firefox is growing at by roughly 5% of the market share per year. This implies that 2010 could be the year that the fox out muscles Microsoft for the biggest market share of Internet users "“ go fox, go!

Browser stats source

2007

IE7

IE6

IE5

Fx

Moz

S

O

September

20.8%

34.9%

1.5%

35.4%

1.2%

1.6%

1.5%

August

20.5%

35.7%

1.5%

34.9%

1.3%

1.5%

1.7%

July

20.1%

36.9%

1.5%

34.5%

1.4%

1.5%

1.9%

June

19.7%

37.3%

1.5%

34.0%

1.4%

1.5%

1.8%

May

19.2%

38.1%

1.6%

33.7%

1.3%

1.5%

1.7%

April

19.1%

38.4%

1.7%

32.9%

1.3%

1.5%

1.6%

March

18.0%

38.7%

2.0%

31.8%

1.3%

1.6%

1.6%

February

16.4%

39.8%

2.5%

31.2%

1.4%

1.7%

1.5%

January

13.3%

42.3%

3.0%

31.0%

1.5%

1.7%

1.5%